Shared genetic architecture and causal relationship between the age at first sex and COVID-19: A large-scale cross-trait analysis (preprint)

COVID-19 is genetically associated with numerous immune disorders, and young age at first intercourse (AFS) may lead to early activation of innate immunity. However, the genetic overlap between COVID-19 and AFS remains undetermined. Here we perform a large-scale cross-trait analysis to investigate their shared genetic etiology and causal relationship. An overall negative genetic correlation between the AFS and three COVID-19 traits was observed. We further identified 186, 221, and 213 shared genetic loci for AFS-COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and severity, respectively. Among these shared loci, those closest to the genes CADM2, and ARPC1B showed the strongest signals. Our post-GWAS functional analysis revealed that the shared mapped genes were mainly involved in neural genesis and development within several brain structures. Finally, bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) results showed that earlier sexual debut may increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and severity.

Journalistic Denial of Death During the Very First Traumatic Period of the Italian SARS-CoV2 Pandemic (preprint)

Exactly one year ago, between February and March 2020, the SARS-CoV2 infection went from an epidemic confined to China to a worldwide pandemic that was particularly lethal in Italy. This study examined media accounts during that period by analysing the representation of death-related constructs in Corriere della Sera, the most widely read newspaper in Italy. A textual and thematic analysis of articles published between period A (epidemic: 23 January–22 February 2020) and period B (pandemic: 23 February–31 March 2020) was conducted using Nvivo-11. A total of 141 articles comprising 48,524 words was collected. The most utilized words and meanings linked to SARS-CoV2 were computed. In the rank distribution, ‘China’ and ’virus’ were the terms most frequently used in both periods. The terms ‘death’ and ‘dead’ were completely absent in period A and appeared in the 535th position in period B. The term ‘dead’ was used primarily to indicate the number of deceased. From a Terror Management Theory perspective, it is possible that the minimal reference to death-related issues was a reflection of death denial and a manifestation of efforts to deny death to manage terror. These findings highlight the ambiguities and ambivalence surrounding any issue pertaining to death; on one side, undue alarmism may provoke exaggerated reactions, such as moral panic, while on the other denial-based messages that minimize references to mortality may reduce safe behaviour during a pandemic.

Neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2 with neuroradiological and neuropathological findings: is the brain a target or a victim?

Coronaviridae family includes pathogen viruses for humans, that lead to clinical conditions with main respiratory involvement; many of these viruses have notoriously a neuroinvasive potential, as demonstrated by published data on SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV epidemics, as well by results obtained in experimental models. During pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), it is noticed that the central nervous system involvement represented a truly significant moment in the history of some COVID-19 patients; indeed, clinical and radiological features published in literature regarding COVID-19 disease are consistent with a neurological involvement. It is also known that histopathological data related to SARS-CoV2 infection have been published with considerable delay, which was even greater for neuropathological information. Moreover, many published data are incomplete, and often the lesions described are not directly related to the action of the virus. In this review, we collected the available radiological and neuropathological information, in order to delineate a more complete picture of the relationship between SARS-Cov2 and brain, focusing our attention on the two most important neuroinvasion routes for the virus. We also highlighted what we consider methodological mistakes both in the autopsy procedures and brain study in COVID-19 deaths. We emphasize the need for a complete study of all the organs in case of autopsy. It is important that through this experience, we no longer do the mistake of neglecting the brain.